Investigasi Retak Dinding pada Jembatan Tipe Post Tensioned Prestressed Concrete Box Girder di Indonesia

Authors

  • Kohar Yudoprasetyo Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Andi Candra Irawan Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Prof. Sigit Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Dr. Husin Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

Keywords:

Segmental Box Girder, Retak Web, Metode Elemen Hingga (FEM), Kapasitas Geser, Creep dan Susut

Abstract

Post-tensioned prestressed concrete segmental box girder banyak digunakan pada jembatan bentang panjang karena efisiensi struktural dan kemudahan konstruksinya. Namun, keretakan pada web dapat menurunkan kinerja, durabilitas, dan keandalan struktur. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi karakteristik retak, mengevaluasi mutu material eksisting, menganalisis respons serta kapasitas geser struktur, dan menentukan faktor dominan penyebab keretakan. Metode penelitian mencakup inspeksi visual dan pemetaan retak, pengujian non-destruktif melalui rebound hammer, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity, dan bar locator, pengujian destruktif melalui core drill dan uji tarik baja, serta pemodelan elemen hingga menggunakan CSI Bridge dengan elemen shell. Model dievaluasi pada kondisi layan dan ultimit, serta mempertimbangkan mutu material aktual, gaya prategang, creep, susut, dan tegangan tambahan pada zona pengangkaran. Hasil menunjukkan retak didominasi pola diagonal dan lentur-geser dengan orientasi 30°–45°, terutama di sekitar blok angkur deviasi tendon. Kuat tekan karakteristik beton aktual sebesar 31,97 MPa lebih rendah daripada mutu rencana 41,50 MPa. Tegangan tarik utama kritis mencapai 2,45 MPa, melampaui batas tarik izin beton sebesar 1,86 MPa. Evaluasi geser menunjukkan beberapa node tidak memenuhi kriteria RSNI T-12:2004, SNI 2847:2019, dan AASHTO. Pengaruh creep dan susut menurunkan angka keamanan sekitar 10–15%. Korelasi spasial menunjukkan bahwa zona tegangan tinggi berimpit dengan sebaran retak yang teridentifikasi selama inspeksi lapangan secara langsung. Keretakan disimpulkan terjadi akibat kombinasi defisit kapasitas geser, konsentrasi tegangan pada blok angkur, kehilangan prategang, dan variasi mutu beton eksisting.

References

D. Xu, L. Dehua, M. Chunyu, W. Peihe, and W. Puxu, “Construction monitoring of a long-span prestressed concrete continuous box girder bridge with variable sections,” Acad. J. Archit. Geotech. Eng., vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.25236/ajage.2023.050101.

M. A. Haider, M. Batikha, and T. Elhag, “Precast versus cast in‐situ concrete in the construction of post‐tensioned box‐girder bridges: Span effect,” Struct. Concr., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 56–64, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1002/suco.201800263.

J. Corven, “Post-tensioned Box Girder Design Manual,” Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, 2016.

D. Huang and B. Hu, “Evaluation of Cracks of Hathaway Precast Concrete Segmental Box Girder Bridge,” presented at the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, 2012, pp. 1–8.

Z. Q. He, Z. J. Ma, and Z. Liu, “Crack-based Serviceability Assessment of Post-tensioned Segmental Concrete Box-girder Bridges,” pp. 693–714, 2021.

J. Baran, V. Borzovič, and Ž. Šenšelová, “Shear Assessment of Existing Prestressed Box Girder Bridge,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1203, 2021.

A. Okeil, “Allowable Tensile Stress for Webs of Prestressed Segmental Concrete Bridges,” ACI Struct. J., pp. 488–495, 2006.

A. K. El-Sayed, A. I. Al-Negheimish, A. M. Alhozaimy, and M. A. Al-Saawani, “Evaluation of Web Shear Design Procedures for Precast Prestressed Hollow Core Slabs,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 23, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings13010023.

K. Yudoprasetyo, Y. Tajunnisa, R. Affandhie, and S. Suwandi, “Evaluasi Kondisi Struktur Terkini dan Rekomendasi Perkuatan pada Gedung Perkantoran di Surabaya,” Sewagati, vol. 8, pp. 2336–2346, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.12962/j26139960.v8i6.2179.

M. A. Alrasyidi, M. F. Rosyidi, K. Yudoprasetyo, P. Al Munawaroh, and A. D. N. Anggraini, “Analisis pengaruh lead rubber bearing terhadap kinerja pilar konvensional pada struktur jembatan highway ortotropik dengan non linear time history analysis,” J. Bangunan Teori Prakt. Penelit. Dan Pengajaran Tek. Bangunan, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2026, doi: 10.17977/um071v31i12026p1-12.

Moh Fadhlan Rosyidi, A. Susanto, K. Yudoprasetyo, and M. A. Alrasyidi, “EVALUASI DAN PERKUATAN BETON BERTULANG STRUKTUR SILO KERUCUT,” Bangunan Teori Prakt. Penelit. Dan Pengajaran Tek. Bangunan, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 169–180, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.17977/um071v30i22025p169-180.

Z.-Q. He, M. Tang, T. Xu, Z. Liu, and Z. Ma, “Additional Shear Stresses in Webs of Segmental Concrete Bridges Due to Anchorage of Cantilever Tendons,” J. Bridge Eng., vol. 26, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001750.

Y. Jin, C. Sun, H. Liu, and D. Xu, “Analysis on the causes of cracking and excessive deflection of long span box girder bridges based on space frame lattice models,” Structures, vol. 50, pp. 464–481, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.014.

Y.-J. Chen, X.-C. Huang, S.-Z. Chen, L.-Y. Wang, J.-W. Zhong, and H. Cheng, “Propagation Effect Analysis of Existing Cracks in Box Girder Bridges Based on the Criterion of Compound Crack Propagation,” Buildings, vol. 14, p. 2958, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/buildings14092958.

G. Cao, J. Shen, L. Yang, K. Li, and Z. Li, “Experimental and Modeling Study on Long-Term Deformation of Three-Span Prestressed Concrete Continuous Box-Girder Bridge Model after Cracking,” J. Bridge Eng., vol. 29, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6725.

U. Pant and J. Shrestha, “Framework for assessing bridge quality index based on the correlation of non-destructive test results,” Heliyon, vol. 10, p. e26392, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26392.

Y. M. Shalaby, M. Badawy, G. A. Ebrahim, and A. M. Abdelalim, “Condition assessment of concrete structures using automated crack detection method for different concrete surface types based on image processing,” Discov. Civ. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 81, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44290-024-00089-5.

Y. J. U. Mangasi, N. K. Kirana, J. Sjah, N. Handika, and E. Vincens, “Correlation of rebound hammer and ultrasonic pulse velocity methods for instant and additive-enhanced concrete,” Struct. Monit. Maint., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 41–55, 2024, doi: 10.12989/smm.2024.11.1.041.

S.-H. Kwon, J.-S. Lee, and H.-K. Kim, “On determination protocols of characteristic in-situ compressive strength of concrete for existing structure: Case study with core samples from actual bridges,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 20, p. e03031, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03031.

M. Sigit Darmawan, R. Bayuaji, R. B. Anugraha, D. A. Saputra, and M. A. Victoriawan, “Case study of performance of a jetty structure after 25 years of exposure in a marine environment considering earthquake load,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 156, p. 107831, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107831.

“Index - LTBP Bridge Performance Primer , December 2013 - FHWA-HRT-13-051.” Accessed: Jul. 22, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/ltbp/13051/

N. Bertola, Y. Reuland, and E. Brühwiler, “Sensing the structural behavior: A perspective on the usefulness of monitoring information for bridge examination,” Front. Built Environ., vol. 8, p. 1045134, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2022.1045134.

M. Debees, F. Lüleci, C. Dong, and N. Catbas, “Investigating the Increase in Load Rating and Reliability of a Prestressed Concrete Bridge When Utilizing Field-Derived Distribution and Impact Factors,” J. Bridge Eng., vol. 29, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6485.

M. D’Amato et al., “The Development and Statistical Analysis of a Material Strength Database of Existing Italian Prestressed Concrete Bridges,” Infrastructures, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 203, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3390/infrastructures10080203.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “Perancangan jembatan terhadap beban gempa,” Badan Standardisasi Nasional, Jakarta, National Standard SNI 2833:2016, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://pesta.bsn.go.id/produk/detail/10990-sni28332016

S. Ojha, P. Pal, and P. K. Mehta, “Computational analysis of curved prestressed concrete box-girder bridges using finite element method,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 7050, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91172-z.

“Insights into structural assessment and long-term effects of a post-tensioned multispan concrete box girder bridge with vertically prestressed internal joints,” Structures, vol. 63, p. 106396, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106396.

E. Andrade Borges, A. T. Slobbe, G. Eumelen, B. Broek, J. Doorgeest, and Y. Yang, “Impact of creep and shrinkage models in predicting deflection and prestress losses of balanced cantilever box girder bridges: A case study with multi‐decade deflection measurements,” Struct. Concr., p. n/a-n/a, May 2026, doi: 10.1002/suco.70646.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “Perencanaan struktur beton untuk jembatan,” Badan Standardisasi Nasional, Jakarta, National Draft Standard RSNI T-12-2004, 2004.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “Persyaratan beton struktural untuk bangunan gedung dan penjelasan,” Badan Standardisasi Nasional, Jakarta, SNI 2847:2019, 2019.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, “AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2020.

M. A. Uddin, “WEIGHTED EFFECT OF CONCENTRATED CRACKING ON THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS,” west virginia university libraries, 2024.

K. Yudoprasetyo, I. R. Hariyanto, Moh. F. Rosyidi, and P. Al Manwaroh, “Aplikasi Teorema Castigliano untuk Analisis Defleksi pada Desain Jembatan Beton Prategang: Pendekatan Metode Energi untuk Evaluasi Kinerja Struktural,” RIGGS J. Artif. Intell. Digit. Bus., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 10558–10572, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.31004/riggs.v4i4.5245.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-11

How to Cite

Yudoprasetyo, K., Irawan, A. C., Darmawan, M. S., & Husin, N. A. (2026). Investigasi Retak Dinding pada Jembatan Tipe Post Tensioned Prestressed Concrete Box Girder di Indonesia. Jurnal Kolaborasi Sains Dan Ilmu Terapan, 5(1.1), 59–71. Retrieved from https://utilityprojectsolution.org/ejournal/index.php/JuKSIT/article/view/222